Thursday, September 10, 2009

Day 20-21 1st Samuel

Needless to say that I am quite behind in my blog. This is also needless to say, but I am still behind in my reading.

I was supposed to be done with 1st Samuel on Monday, but it is now Thursday. That means I have a lot of reading to catch up. And a lot of blogging to catch up.

But first, I want to give you my really bad excuse as to why I am so far behind... college football. At first football only got in the way of my blog (Judges and Ruth), but then it became priority over reading the Bible.

See bad excuse... and this weekend I won't have that excuse, because I am limiting myself to watching just one football game (UM/ND). So, I will have plenty of time to read the Bible and stay caught up with things that should be priorities.

Thank you to those of you who have bugged me about it. I need the accountability.

Now... enough really poor excuses... 1st Samuel.

Saul, Samuel, and David are the main characters in this book. Samuel is a prophet (not a priest like I originally thought). Saul is a bad king. David is God's chosen (soon to be) king.

If you would have asked me last week what Samuel's position was in Israel, I would have said that he was a priest. He served with Eli. He prepared sacrifices. I just assumed he was a Levite.

I was wrong. 1 Samuel 1:1 was really confusing for me. Samuel was from the tribe of Ephraim. Then, as I continued to read, Samuel was not a priest. I had been thinking he was the high priest.

But, it makes sense that he is a prophet since he is speaking for God and (get this) prophesying.

Saul was a bad king. I think that it is interesting that the first king that God lets Israel have is a poor one. Saul seems like the perfect choice as king. He is tall and handsome.

If I am picking a king, I want those leadership qualities. Tall and handsome. What is this high school? Really Israel? Pick a king because he is tall and handsome?

But then I think about what I learned in history class that since the invention of television, the "better looking" candidate has won the election in America almost every time. We aren't so different, are we?

Then, there is David. The youngest in his family. No leadership training. His father and brothers don't even think to bring him to the house to possibly be picked as king.

God picks the king that He knows will serve Him. God picks the leader who is following His voice. God picks a king who is spiritually mature, even though he is physically just a child.

David probably has as much faith as anyone in the entire Bible. He is up there with Paul and Daniel. They are probably my top 3.

I don't know about you, but as a teenager I don't think I ever fought a giant. I never led an army into battle and completely destroyed the opposition.

As a teen, I was worried about running sprints in soccer practice and who killed Lincoln and whether this girl who I was too afraid to talk to liked me. (BTW... the best way for someone to like you is to not talk to them... and if you believe that I have some ocean front property in Montana to sell you)

And you can say... back in the day teens weren't teens. And you can talk about how teens didn't exist like we know them until the invention of high school in the early 1900s. But the point is, God was preparing his leader as a child.

In America, what do we expect of teens? We expect them to go to school, not get into (too much) trouble (or at least don't get caught), and basically act immature while beginning to become independent.

That is completely different than what David was doing. David was leading armies. David was a national hero and not because he could shoot a ball into a basket (it was some one's skull instead).

Our culture has spread this adolescent trend from just 13-18 year-olds to about 9-25 year-olds. And you can see it spreading even further in the near future.

At what point do we expect our children/ourselves to "grow up?" I'm not saying "grow up" to mean be boring. I'm saying "grow up" to mean be mature.

David was "a man after God's own heart." Don't you want that to be said of you/your kids? I want God to say that about me.

David wasn't put in charge of the armies because he was tall or handsome. He was placed by God in positions of leadership, because of his faith. David didn't waste years of his life "having fun."

David spent his whole life seeking God and serving God.

4 comments:

  1. jonathan really stuck out to me... he and his armorbearer just toppled the entire philistine army, pretty much singlehandedly! and even before that, 1 sam 13:3-4: Jonathan was put in charge of 1000 men and they smote a garrison (not sure how many that is?) of the Philistines and the whole army heard about it. then saul gets the credit!! i am not sure if he was also a teen at this point, but he may have been. no wonder he and david were such good friends... they were the 2 God put in charge of desolating the philistines. think if they had ever gone to war together!!! (maybe they did i haven't read that far yet !)

    and the armorbearer? there was another place we read recently where a main character is conversing with his armorbearer i can't remember where right now (maybe it was Joshua's when they went down to scout the enemy??)... but those guys have a lot of say! their masters actually listen to them, and God's giving success to the master actually has a lot to do with the armorguy following whole-heartedly. and they aren't even named!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. it was Gideon's armorbearer... but yeah those are definitely great points

    99.99% of all the people God has used in history are "no name nobodys"... there are a couple hundred in the Bible... but even when they all start most of them are nobodys

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think again we see the mercy of God again in the story of David. David committed a few grievious sins, voyeurism, seduction, adultery and murder. This resulted in the death of his first son with Bathsheba and brought about that "the sword would never leave his household". But David repented and was remoseful and asked forgiveness and God forgave him. Still, he never had pease after that and had so much trouble from his children because he had been a neglectful father.

    David's greatness did not hold up. We see Solomon reach the heights, but then slide away from God because of his lust for women and after that the kings are an undependable mix.

    We have to remember, though, that it was not God's desire for israel to have a king, but the people in essence rejected God and he allowed them to have a King like other countries. They learned how undependable human government can be from the experience.

    We need to take from this there is one faithful and perfect King that we should follow.

    Larry

    ReplyDelete
  4. Glad to see you're back - I was about to get on your case!

    Good thoughts about "growing up". I think as a society today, we are WAY too lax in our expectations of "kids". Yes, kids need to be kids, but they also need to learn right from wrong and be held accountable for their choices and actions. Parents are too busy with their own lives to parent, and thus the kids are never taught how to behave properly. It's a cultural epidemic. I'm glad I have the privilege of being a parent to my kids!

    ReplyDelete